Where State, Market, and Community Meet
Village Doctors and the Governance of Rural Health in China
ResearchPosted on rand.org Jun 24, 2026Published in: Social Science & Medicine, Volume 400, 119294 (July 2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119294
Village Doctors and the Governance of Rural Health in China
ResearchPosted on rand.org Jun 24, 2026Published in: Social Science & Medicine, Volume 400, 119294 (July 2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119294
Effective health governance is essential for ensuring accessible, equitable, efficient, and high-quality healthcare services. Yet it is often overlooked or oversimplified in health services studies in rural China. We examine the unique role of village doctors in shaping public health governance in rural China.
A two-phase ethnographic study was conducted in Gaomi, Shandong, from February to May 2023. Phase one involved a one-month in-field rapid assessment of the local health system. Phase two included two months of fieldwork, with participant observation and informal interviews with patients, clinicians, and officials.
Village doctors acted as “quasi-officials,” mediating between state authority and local community life. Their practices are shaped by state directives, local moral norms, and market pressures, producing adaptive governance within a “third sphere”, which translates national policies into locally workable arrangements. Three overlapping roles for the village doctors emerged: state agent (implementing policies), health care giver (balancing ethics with community embeddedness), and entrepreneur (navigating entrepreneurial pressures). Although these roles can lead to conflicts and create a precarious professional scenario, village doctors exercise strategic agency, negotiating competing responsibilities to sustain their legitimacy and livelihood.
Public health practices in rural China emerge within a “third sphere,” where state, market, and community intersect. Village doctors negotiate multiple, often conflicting roles, balancing professional ethics, community obligations, and entrepreneurial pressures. This study challenges simplistic binaries of state versus society, revealing public health governance as a dynamic interplay between structural forces and localized practices.
This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.