Ensuring Successful Personnel Management in the Department of Homeland Security

Beth J. Asch

ResearchPublished 2002

The new Department of Homeland Security will be faced with the challenge of implementing and further improving the human resources (HR) system agreed upon by the President and Congress. To help meet the challenge, this Issue Paper draws from management and economics studies to identify the characteristics that make the HR system in any organization effective. It finds that existing civil service flexibility-related tools, if used, can be highly effective. For example, retention allowances, buyouts, and early retirement incentives can induce federal workers to change their retention, separation, and retirement decisions. For these policies to have their maximum effect, however, the barriers to their use--such as inadequate funding and overly cumbersome administrative procedures--must be addressed. While expanded use of flexibility-related policies will help, their use alone will not address possible problems such as excessive or insufficient oversight, hiring inadequacies, and poorly conceived management and employee performance incentives. Policymakers must be prepared to develop, implement, and monitor the HR system to ensure that it is meeting all of its objectives and to aggressively address any shortcomings that are identified.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Asch, Beth J., Ensuring Successful Personnel Management in the Department of Homeland Security, RAND Corporation, IP-235-NSRD, 2002. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP235.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Asch, Beth J., Ensuring Successful Personnel Management in the Department of Homeland Security. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2002. https://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP235.html.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was performed under the auspices of RAND's National Security Research Division.

This publication is part of the RAND issue paper series. The issue paper was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that contained early data analysis, an informed perspective on a topic, or a discussion of research directions, not necessarily based on published research. The issue paper was meant to be a vehicle for quick dissemination intended to stimulate discussion in a policy community.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.