Cover: Designing Military Pay

Designing Military Pay

Contributions and Implications of the Economics Literature

Published 1993

by Beth J. Asch


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback84 pages $13.00

What should be the structure of military compensation for active-duty personnel? This broad question is the focus of the review of the economic literature presented in this report. The review addresses a more specific question, How should military basic pay be designed? Some of the key guidelines derived from the survey are that (1) individuals in occupations or positions with disamenities (e.g., greater injury/death/health risks) must receive higher pay than those in occupations with amenities; (2) compensation should rise with grade or with hierarchical level; (3) the intergrade compensation spread should increase with grade; (4) promotion policy can increase each individual's motivation and performance; (5) explicit up-or-out policies can sometimes be replaced by implicit up-or-out policies; (6) individuals have different abilities to perform different jobs; (7) compensation within a grade should be contingent on effort and/or performance; (8) the best matches between personnel and grades can be achieved by not motivating to move up in the ranks those who are relatively less able to perform the tasks associated with the higher grades; and (9) the pay gap across grades should be greater than the pay gap within a grade. The report points to aspects of the military that violate these guidelines and makes recommendations for future work to apply the findings.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.