Cover: The Effects of Equipment Age On Mission Critical Failure Rates: A Study of M1 Tanks

The Effects of Equipment Age On Mission Critical Failure Rates: A Study of M1 Tanks

Published 2004

by Eric Peltz, Lisa Pelled Colabella, Brian Williams, Patricia Boren

Download

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback126 pages $20.00

Military budget limits in the late 1990s and the timeline for the Army's next generation of weapon systems have resulted in the aging of many of the Army's fleets and projected extensions in their service lives. There is a widespread belief that the increases in fleet age will create readiness and cost problems. The Army is executing recapitalization programs to rebuild or upgrade selected weapon systems in order to retain combat capabilities and hold down maintenance costs. To aid in that effort, this research assesses the effects of age on mission-critical failure rates for M1 Abrams tanks. Results suggest that tank age is a significant predictor of M1 mission-critical failures, as are usage and location. The aging effect is estimated at a 3 to 7 percent increase in tank failures per year of age, about a doubling of the failure rate, over the first 14 years of a tank's life. The magnitude and pattern of aging effects were found to differ across tank subsystems, revealing that a distinct subset of components contributes to the aging effects. These parts are the best candidates for replacement with like components in rebuild efforts. Other components emerge as readiness and/or cost drivers, whether or not a tank is new or old, indicating the need for reliability upgrade initiatives rather than simple replacement with new parts. These findings should help quantify the value of Abrams recapitalization efforts and suggest potential subsystems to target in those efforts with regard to both rebuild and upgrade.

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army and conducted within the RAND Arroyo Center.

This report is part of the RAND monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.