Download
Download eBook for Free
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 5.1 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
Format | List Price | Price | |
---|---|---|---|
Add to Cart | Paperback109 pages | $15.00 | $12.00 20% Web Discount |
This report presents the design and pilot study of a model for collecting in-depth, benchmark data on school coursework, intended to improve the quality of curriculum data obtained through national surveys of classroom teachers. Homework, quizzes, classroom exercises, projects, and exams were collected over the course of a semester from 70 mathematics teachers in California and Washington. The teachers also completed daily logs of their instructional practices. These data were compared with teachers' responses on surveys similar to those used in national data collection efforts. The results showed how well survey data measure curriculum, as compared with data that are closer to actual classroom instruction. Procedures are recommended for periodically validating data collected from large-scale surveys, and enhancements in the type and number of items included on those surveys are suggested.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Study Methods
Chapter Three
Instructional Context
Chapter Four
Instructional Strategy
Chapter Five
Instructional Goals
Chapter Six
Design Choices for Improved Curriculum Indicators
Appendix
Survey Instruments
References
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation and the National Center for Education Statistics.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.