The Departments of Defense and Veterans' Affairs pay veterans about $35 billion in disability compensation each year for disabilities ranging from battlefield injuries to health conditions like diabetes and asthma. The authors examine the adequacy of disability compensation to offset the reduction in civilian earnings opportunities that are associated with service-connected disabilities and recommend changes to disability compensation.

Is Military Disability Compensation Adequate to Offset Civilian Earnings Losses from Service-Connected Disabilities?

Richard Buddin, Bing Han

ResearchPublished Aug 8, 2012

Cover: Is Military Disability Compensation Adequate to Offset Civilian Earnings Losses from Service-Connected Disabilities?
Download PDF
Additional Downloads

Includes Summary Only

The Departments of Defense and Veterans' Affairs (DoD and VA) pay about $35 billion in disability compensation to about 3.2 million veterans each year. Their disabilities range from battlefield injuries to health conditions like diabetes and asthma. This research examines the adequacy of disability compensation to offset the reduction in civilian earnings opportunities that are associated with service-connected disabilities (SCDs). The authors focus on cohorts of veterans who left active military service between fiscal year (FY) 1993 and FY 2004. They track these veterans' civilian earnings and labor force participation for up to 12 years, from 1994 through 2005, compare the labor-market success of veterans with and without SCDs, and recommend changes to disability compensation.

Key Findings

Disability Compensation for Veterans with Service-Connected Disabilities (SCDs) Exceeds the Average Earnings Losses for Most Veterans

  • The loss in civilian earnings for veterans with SCDs is more than offset by the size of disability payments, the tax-free status of those payments, and the availability of concurrent receipt for nondisability retirees with ratings of 50 percent or greater.
  • The disability payments associated with the Veterans Affairs Schedule of Rated Disabilities are generally higher than the actual earnings losses for each rating level and across most types of veterans.

But Some Veterans Suffer Civilian Financial Losses from Their SCD

  • Some veterans with medical separations fare worse than others with comparable ratings.
  • Disability payments are proportionately less generous for former officers than for former enlisted members.
  • Veterans with disability separations from active duty have much lower earnings than do comparable other veterans with the same rating.

Recommendations

  • Congress and program managers should better define the goals and objectives of disability compensation.
  • Ratings should reflect changes in modern medicine and the limitations of service-connected disabilities (SCDs) in the current labor market.
  • Defense Department payments for disability separations should target the earnings disruption and loss of military retirement opportunities associated with unexpected separation from active duty.
  • Disability compensation for SCDs should be left entirely to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2012
  • Pages: 127
  • Document Number: MG-1098-OSD

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Buddin, Richard and Bing Han, Is Military Disability Compensation Adequate to Offset Civilian Earnings Losses from Service-Connected Disabilities? RAND Corporation, MG-1098-OSD, 2012. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1098.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Buddin, Richard and Bing Han, Is Military Disability Compensation Adequate to Offset Civilian Earnings Losses from Service-Connected Disabilities? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2012. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1098.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The research was conducted within the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by OSD, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.

This publication is part of the RAND monograph series. RAND monographs were products of RAND from 2003 to 2011 that presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs were subjected to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.