Wind Tunnel and Propulsion Test Facilities

An Assessment of NASA’s Capabilities to Serve National Needs

Philip S. Anton, Eugene C. Gritton, Richard Mesic, Paul S. Steinberg, Dana J. Johnson, Michael Block, Michael Scott Brown, Jeffrey A. Drezner, James Dryden, Thomas Hamilton, et al.

ResearchPublished Nov 16, 2004

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) establishment and use of wind tunnel and propulsion test facilities have helped the United States build and maintain aerospace competitive advantage across the military, commercial, and space sectors. Are these major facilities continuing to serve the current and future needs of the nation at large? At the request of Congress and NASA, the RAND Corporation performed a yearlong study of the 31 such facilities at three NASA centers. The study examined current and future national needs for wind tunnel and propulsion test facilities, the technical competitiveness of NASA’s facilities, functional overlap and redundancy among NASA facilities, and management issues. The study recommends that NASA develop an aeronautics test technology vision and plan; analyze the viability of a national test facility plan with the Department of Defense; continue to use an appropriate mix of facility, computational, and flight testing; maintain an identified minimum set of NASA facilities, specifically leaving out two facilities that are not serving national needs and are weakly competitive, redundant, and poorly utilized; identify financial shared support to keep its underutilized but important facilities from entering financial collapse; and pursue selected investments in test facilities. A companion report (Wind Tunnel and Propulsion Test Facilities: Supporting Analyses to an Assessment of NASA’s Capabilities to Serve National Needs, TR-134-NASA/OSD) presents additional details of the researchers’ findings.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
142 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2004
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 142
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-3590-5
  • Document Number: MG-178-NASA/OSD

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Anton, Philip S., Eugene C. Gritton, Richard Mesic, Paul S. Steinberg, Dana J. Johnson, Michael Block, Michael Scott Brown, Jeffrey A. Drezner, James Dryden, Thomas Hamilton, Thor Hogan, Deborah Peetz, Raj Raman, Joe Strong, and William P. G. Trimble, Wind Tunnel and Propulsion Test Facilities: An Assessment of NASA’s Capabilities to Serve National Needs, RAND Corporation, MG-178-NASA/OSD, 2004. As of October 6, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG178.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Anton, Philip S., Eugene C. Gritton, Richard Mesic, Paul S. Steinberg, Dana J. Johnson, Michael Block, Michael Scott Brown, Jeffrey A. Drezner, James Dryden, Thomas Hamilton, Thor Hogan, Deborah Peetz, Raj Raman, Joe Strong, and William P. G. Trimble, Wind Tunnel and Propulsion Test Facilities: An Assessment of NASA’s Capabilities to Serve National Needs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2004. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG178.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was jointly sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The research was conducted in the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center supported by the OSD, the Joint Staff, the unified commands, and the defense agencies.

This publication is part of the RAND monograph series. RAND monographs were products of RAND from 2003 to 2011 that presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs were subjected to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.