Fiscally Informed Total Force Manpower

Harry J. Thie, John Christian, Matthew Stafford, Roland J. Yardley, Peter Schirmer

ResearchPublished Apr 14, 2008

This monograph presents the results of a short-term review of 27 publicly available manpower studies to discover methods that other organizations could use to make ''fiscally informed'' manpower decisions. The studies varied widely in their definition of cost-effectiveness. Methods included cutting the workforce, trading one workforce for another, reinvesting fixed manpower in higher-valued functions, trading end-strength for experience, and making short-term technology investments to reduce manpower in the long term. The authors conclude that the method used to determine manpower requirements may not be as important as other attributes of the studies, such as the direct involvement of a senior decisionmaker; stating specific goals as part of the study charter; a holistic view of the organization being studied; publicly available and auditable results; and a clear set of measurement criteria upon which to make decisions.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
104 pages
List Price
$23.50
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2008
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 104
  • Paperback Price: $23.50
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-4418-1
  • Document Number: MG-606-OSD

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Thie, Harry J., John Christian, Matthew Stafford, Roland J. Yardley, and Peter Schirmer, Fiscally Informed Total Force Manpower, RAND Corporation, MG-606-OSD, 2008. As of October 13, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG606.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Thie, Harry J., John Christian, Matthew Stafford, Roland J. Yardley, and Peter Schirmer, Fiscally Informed Total Force Manpower. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2008. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG606.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This research was sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense and conducted within the Forces and Resources Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.

This publication is part of the RAND monograph series. RAND monographs were products of RAND from 2003 to 2011 that presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs were subjected to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.