How Should Air Force Expeditionary Medical Capabilities Be Expressed?

Don Snyder, Edward W. Chan, James J. Burks, Mahyar A. Amouzegar, Adam C. Resnick

ResearchPublished Feb 24, 2009

This report devises a new metric for measuring expeditionary medical support (EMEDS) and develops a framework for applying it across three Air Force medical mission areas: deployed support to the warfighter, humanitarian relief, and defense support to civil authorities. The operational emphasis of EMEDS is on patient flow. An injured patient receives limited treatment locally and is then moved from the point of injury to an EMEDS facility as quickly as possible. There, the patient is further evaluated, stabilized, triaged, treated, and evacuated to a higher level of care. Each level of care is designed to be sufficient for immediate needs, not to provide definitive care. This emphasis on flow streamlines capabilities that need to be deployed and places the definitive care in the most capable facilities. The current measure of EMEDS capabilities, the number of available beds, is inadequate because the components of the expeditionary medical system are not intended to hold patients. The new metric developed in this study focuses on the rate at which each component of the deployment system can evaluate, stabilize, triage and treat, and evacuate patients, or the medical STEP rate. This measure more closely captures the requirement at the time of need and holds the promise of providing a more agile, responsive, and effective medical deployment capability.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
56 pages
List Price
$23.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2009
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 56
  • Paperback Price: $23.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-4574-4
  • Document Number: MG-785-AF

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Snyder, Don, Edward W. Chan, James J. Burks, Mahyar A. Amouzegar, and Adam C. Resnick, How Should Air Force Expeditionary Medical Capabilities Be Expressed? RAND Corporation, MG-785-AF, 2009. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG785.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Snyder, Don, Edward W. Chan, James J. Burks, Mahyar A. Amouzegar, and Adam C. Resnick, How Should Air Force Expeditionary Medical Capabilities Be Expressed? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2009. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG785.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force and conducted by RAND Project AIR FORCE.

This publication is part of the RAND monograph series. RAND monographs were products of RAND from 2003 to 2011 that presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs were subjected to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.