Dualism, technical change, and rural finance markets in developing countries
Published 1981
This study investigates the anatomy of rural finance markets (RFMs) in a major developing country, India. The heart of the study consists of an empirical model of the determinants of moneylender interest rates which takes into account both the special features of Indian RFMs as revealed by a cursory overview of the distribution of rural loans by size, type, purpose, and source and some special features of the dataset used. The model allows tests of some important propositions linking RFMs to various aspects of rural economic development. The results show that interest rates charged by rural moneylenders are sensitive to a host of borrower-specific and locational characteristics that are affected by the process of economic development. It is concluded that the provision of technical change and investment opportunities may be less costly than direct subsidization as a way of bringing down rural interest rates in developing countries.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1981
- Pages: 39
- Document Number: N-1723-AID
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.