Variations in the Content and Style of NIH Consensus Statements, 1979-1983
Jan 1, 1984
|PDF file||6.4 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
|Add to Cart||Paperback151 pages||$35.00||$28.00 20% Web Discount|
This Note examines the treatment of eight consensus development conferences, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), in the medical literature during a period of three or four years following each conference. It describes areas of publicly expressed agreement and disagreement with the conference recommendations and identifies other papers that may have influenced physicians concurrently with the conference. It also reports on the extent of coverage of each conference in the professional literature, the frequency and types of citations to conference findings, and the influence of conference findings and recommendations on later scientific and professional reports. The eight consensus development conferences were on the topics of antenatal diagnosis, primary treatment of breast cancer, steroid receptors, estrogen use for postmenopausal symptoms, thrombolytic therapy, Pap smear, caesarean birth, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.