Decentralized Decision-Making for Schools

New Promise for an Old Idea?

Janet S. Hansen, Marguerite Roza

ResearchPublished Aug 23, 2005

Argues that decentralizing decisionmaking authority to schools is a reform worthy of a new look, despite the perceived failure of earlier school-based management (SBM) efforts to improve student performance. SBM as it was implemented in districts and schools did not produce significant changes in institutional structure. Constraints on schools were not effectively relaxed; school-based decisionmaking authority in some areas was nullified by continuing constraints in others. Most notably, principals in the United States gained little authority over their budgets. The need to boost school performance significantly in the next few years to meet federal and state accountability goals demands new ways of helping principals do their jobs more effectively. Decentralized decisionmaking for schools (DDS) should be explored in light of lessons learned from implementation of meaningful school-level autonomy in a few American districts and in England.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2005
  • Pages: 6
  • Document Number: OP-153-EDU

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Hansen, Janet S. and Marguerite Roza, Decentralized Decision-Making for Schools: New Promise for an Old Idea? RAND Corporation, OP-153-EDU, 2005. As of September 4, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP153.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Hansen, Janet S. and Marguerite Roza, Decentralized Decision-Making for Schools: New Promise for an Old Idea? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2005. https://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP153.html.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was conducted within RAND Education.

This publication is part of the RAND occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers were products of RAND from 2003 to 2013 that included informed perspectives on a timely policy issue, discussions of new research methodologies, essays, papers presented at a conference, and summaries of work in progress.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.