Research Brief
Improving Disabled Veterans' Employment Prospects Using Tax Credits
Apr 11, 2012
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 0.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
In response to growing concerns regarding the employment situation of veterans, between 2007 and 2011 Congress enacted three separate employer tax credits designed to encourage veteran hiring. For these initiatives, as for many other federal programs that aim to improve veterans' employment prospects, there exists little rigorous evidence demonstrating program effectiveness. This paper uses the 2007 expansion of the Work Opportunity Tax Credit program to measure the impact of tax credits on employment of disabled veterans. Using nationally representative data from the American Community Survey and a multiple-differences research design, the paper demonstrates that the new tax credit increased employment among the target group of disabled veterans by 2 percentage points in 2007 and 2008, representing roughly 32,000 jobs each year. Impacts were largest for older veterans, and the tax credits improved employment for those with both cognitive and noncognitive disabilities. The credit also increased income of the targeted group by around 40 percent and primarily generated full-time positions. Rough calculations place the cost of this program per job generated at around $10,000 or less. These results suggest that tax credits can be an effective means of improving employment among disadvantaged veteran populations.
This research was conducted within the Forces and Resources Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to help ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.