Cover: A Game Theory Analysis of Tactical Air War

A Game Theory Analysis of Tactical Air War

Published 1959

by Leonard David Berkovitz, Melvin Dresher


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback49 pages $20.00

The study of a problem in tactical air war concerned with the allocation at each strike of the tactical forces among such competing air tasks as counterair, air-defense, and support of ground operations. A two-person multimove game is formulated in which the allocation decisions of the combatants represent the moves of the game. The game model assumes that counterair missions destroy enemy forces, air-defense missions reduce the enemy's counterair operations, and support of ground operations contributes to the payoff. The optimal allocations derived from the game-theoretic analysis of this model are described, and possible implications of the results for operational gaming are discussed.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.