Dilemmas in the Politico-Military Conduct of Escalating Crises
Expert InsightsPublished 1965
Expert InsightsPublished 1965
A discussion of the difficulty in accomplishing political direction of the military in rapidly escalating nuclear crises. From the study of hypothetical crises by means of hand-played games, it is found that differences in responsibilities, perceptions, and operational styles between the political and military agencies result in inconsistencies between decisions and actions. It is also found that the political leaders are often deficient in adapting policies to the command-control constraints emerging during interactions with military sections.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.