Teaching of Policy Sciences : Design for a Doctorate University Program.

Yehezkel Dror

ResearchPublished 1969

An outline of the proposed content and objectives of a curriculum for a postgraduate program in policy sciences. As envisioned, training of policy scientists on the doctorate level should involve multidimensional learning experiences--traditional lectures, readings, exercises, colloquia, and seminars. Such experiences should enable optimal understanding of three basic areas of policy science: decisionmaking and policymaking behavior, normative policy theory, and institutional change. Learning methods should include, as a minimum, gaming, cases and projects, internship, new types of dissertations, and study tours. Some experimentation with task directed T-group methods is indicated. Various activities are considered to advance policy sciences as an interdiscipline and further its academic and professional recognition. 40 pp.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
40 pages
List Price
$23.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1969
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 40
  • Paperback Price: $23.00
  • Document Number: P-4128-1

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Dror, Yehezkel, Teaching of Policy Sciences : Design for a Doctorate University Program. RAND Corporation, P-4128-1, 1969. As of September 13, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4128-1.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Dror, Yehezkel, Teaching of Policy Sciences : Design for a Doctorate University Program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1969. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4128-1.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.