Consumer Perceptions of Health Care Services: Implications for the Academic Medical Community.

John E. Ware, W. Redwood Wright, Mary K. Snyder, G. C. Chu

Expert InsightsPublished 1975

The factor analytic development of various measures of consumer perceptions regarding characteristics of doctors and health care services is described. Index scores meeting factor analytic and reliability criteria were used to study the importance of consumer perceptions in relation to behavioral outcomes. Numerous dimensions of consumer perceptions were identified and described, including beliefs about doctor conduct in terms of quality of care, and humaneness of health care delivery, as well as satisfaction with such enabling components as the continuity of care, availability and convenience of services, and various access mechanisms (cost, payment mechanisms, and ease of obtaining emergency care services). Measures of these perceptions were shown to be related to differences in several estimates of health services utilization. The use of index scores which have met empirical criteria is in contrast to the common practice of using individual questionnaire items as the unit of analysis in health care research. Findings are discussed in relation to program planning and evaluation in medical education, and suggestions for future research are noted. 17 pp. Ref.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1975
  • Pages: 17
  • Document Number: P-5440

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Ware, John E., W. Redwood Wright, Mary K. Snyder, and G. C. Chu, Consumer Perceptions of Health Care Services: Implications for the Academic Medical Community. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1975. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5440.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.