Will Terrorists Go Nuclear?

Brian Michael Jenkins

ResearchPublished 1975

Testimony given before the California State Assembly Committee on Energy and Diminishing Materials regarding the possibility that terrorists might steal fissionable material or nuclear weapons, attack nuclear facilities, or create nuclear hoaxes. In the author's view, the primary attraction of nuclear material for terrorists is not causing mass casualties, but the fact that terrorist action associated with the word “nuclear” attracts attention and generates fear. Mass casualties do not serve the terrorists' goals and could alienate their constituents. The same constraints may not apply to nihilistic groups or lunatics; however, those most willing to cause widespread death may be the least able to do so. As the nuclear industry expands during the next few years, there may be a growing number of hoaxes and minor acts of sabotage, simply because the number of nuclear facilities has increased; however, the inconvenience and political repercussions these incidents produce probably will exceed the actual danger to public safety.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
10 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1975
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 10
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-5541

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Jenkins, Brian Michael, Will Terrorists Go Nuclear? RAND Corporation, P-5541, 1975. As of September 19, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5541.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Jenkins, Brian Michael, Will Terrorists Go Nuclear? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1975. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5541.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.