Cover: Lotteries and Menus

Lotteries and Menus

A Comment on Unbounded Utilities

Published 1976

by Lloyd S. Shapley


Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback14 pages $20.00

A sequel to P-4940, the author argues that the issue of whether utilities can be unbounded is independent of the considerations surrounding the St. Petersburg paradox. On the one hand, the Bernoulli lottery can be modified so that the utilities are bounded without losing whatever power the classical paradox may have to make a risk-linear utility for money look absurd. On the other hand, the logical challenge that the Bernoulli game raises against unbounded utilities (as distinct from unbelievably large, but mathematically bounded utilities) can be raised just as well in a more basic, non-lottery setting where ordinally ranked outcomes are selected from "menus." An illustrative game called "Blank Check" plays a central role in the discussion.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.