Cover: The People's Republic of China in a proliferated world

The People's Republic of China in a proliferated world

Published 1979

by Jonathan D. Pollack

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback31 pages $20.00

Assesses the probabilities that Japan, Taiwan or South Korea might develop nuclear weapons, and what the consequences of proliferation might be for the People's Republic of China (PRC). The possibility that any of these states might embark on a nuclear weapons program is remote because of the political, diplomatic, and military costs, which outweigh any advantages from an independent nuclear capability. Should proliferation nevertheless occur in Japan, Taiwan, or South Korea, it would indicate a substantial loss of faith in the American security role. China has abstained from transferring nuclear technology to other countries. If proliferation seemed underway on China's periphery, this could be deleterious to China's interests, although PRC leaders remain ambivalent or noncommittal on how they might react to such a possibility.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.