A Survey of Incentives for Staff Development of Computer-Based Instruction

John D. Winkler, Cathy Stasz

ResearchPublished 1985

This paper considers the role that different types of district and school incentives play in increasing teacher participation in computer staff development. (A companion paper, P-7086, considers how district and school incentives may improve the quality of computer-based instruction.) The authors examined the effects of a variety of administrative policies with incentive value for increasing teachers' participation in computer staff development, including incremental salary credit, reimbursement for outside courses, release time, and new job titles with higher salaries. The findings suggest that technical support has the greatest incentive value for teachers, and an important incentive was among those found least in this sample: a guarantee of computer access. An increased number of computers per teacher also improved computer inservice participation.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
9 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1985
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 9
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-7087

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Winkler, John D. and Cathy Stasz, A Survey of Incentives for Staff Development of Computer-Based Instruction, RAND Corporation, P-7087, 1985. As of October 15, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7087.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Winkler, John D. and Cathy Stasz, A Survey of Incentives for Staff Development of Computer-Based Instruction. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1985. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P7087.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.