Information Needs for Drug Abuse Policy in the Washington Metropolitan Area
ResearchPublished 1989
ResearchPublished 1989
Information about drug abuse in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area is needed (1) to raise public awareness, (2) to help local policymakers decide what to do, and (3) to track overall progress. Existing public data systems suffice for the first purpose, but not for the second and third. This paper discusses data currently available from medical examiners and hospital emergency rooms, from routine urinalysis of arrestees, from school surveys, from drug treatment programs, and on arrests and prosecutions. Gaps in geographic coverage and in coverage of populations of special concern (youth, intravenous drug users, pregnant women) are assessed. Information about drug prices and availability and about prevention efforts is needed for policy decisions but is not yet collected systematically. The paper illustrates some of the uses, as well as problems, of a regional household survey on drug abuse.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.