Cover: Worst-case planning for a nuclear-capable North Korea: implications for U.S. force deployments

Worst-case planning for a nuclear-capable North Korea: implications for U.S. force deployments

Published 1993

by James A. Winnefeld

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback6 pages $20.00

This Paper speculates on what the author considers the likely scenario of North Korea's acquiring a rudimentary nuclear weapons capability. He proposes that such acquisition be a major regional planning assumption underpinning U.S. policy and that options be developed to respond to it, while at the same time plans should attempt to prevent North Korea from acquiring nuclear weapons. He lays out four regional security alternatives in response to North Korea becoming a nuclear power. Some of the policy options under these alternatives include the reintroduction of U.S. nuclear weapons in the region to head off a nuclear arms race among regional powers.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.