Balancing the risks and benefits of the European Economic Security Strategy

The case of the electric vehicles industry

Maxime Sommerfeld Antoniou, Mélusine Lebret

Expert InsightsPublished May 3, 2024

This perspective reflects on the European Union's (EU) approach to economic security, particularly since the release of its Economic Security Strategy (ESS) in June 2023. It examines the case of the electric vehicle (EV) industry.

The structure of the global economy, with its 'hub and spoke' topography, makes it difficult to manage supply chain disruptions, and it is subject to potential economic coercion, weaponised interdependences and overreliance on competing nations. Given these risks, states are seeking to pursue greater economic security to protect their prosperity and strategic interests.

The EU, much like individual states, has embraced this geoeconomic shift, moving away from laissez-faire economic doctrines towards a more interventionist and protectionist approach. Using the EV industry as a case study, the perspective illustrates that the EU has structured its economic security policy instruments along the ESS tryptic of Promote-Protect-Partner to become more competitive on the global market.

This perspective underscores the need for a clear understanding of risks to avoid a 'what does this button do' approach to economic security. As such, it recommends using tools such as tabletop exercises and quantitative models to better anticipate and prepare for the unintended consequences of economic security policies and make well-informed decisions.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Sommerfeld Antoniou, Maxime and Mélusine Lebret, Balancing the risks and benefits of the European Economic Security Strategy: The case of the electric vehicles industry. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA3206-1.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND expert insights series. The expert insights series presents perspectives on timely policy issues.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.