State-Level Opioid Policy Analyses

Moving Beyond the Classic Difference-in-Differences Model

by Beth Ann Griffin, Megan S. Schuler, Elizabeth A. Stuart

Download Free Electronic Document

Presentation Slides Part 1

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Presentation Slides Part 2

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 12.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Motivated by the context of opioid policy research, this workshop provides an overview of key methodological challenges faced when evaluating the effectiveness of state-level policy using annual state-level data, as well as potential solutions and practice guidelines. We begin by discussing the commonly used linear difference-in-differences (DID) model and then cover alternative approaches involving autoregressive models that have been shown to be more promising. We continue the webinar by discussing confounding and heterogeneous policy effects, effects of concurrent policies, and additional design-based approaches (e.g., event studies and stacked comparative interrupted time series).

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Presentation series. RAND presentations may include briefings related to a body of RAND research, videos of congressional testimonies, and a multimedia presentation on a topic or RAND capability. All RAND presentations represent RAND's commitment to quality and objectivity.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.