Use of Weather-Information in Determining Cost/Performance and Force-Mix Tradeoffs
Weather and Warplanes I
ResearchPublished 1971
Weather and Warplanes I
ResearchPublished 1971
A selective overview of weather-effect studies over the past 20 years, and proposed methods for incorporating weather factors into the force planning and acquisition process. So-called all-weather systems have higher cost and, often, lower effectiveness than simpler systems, and may be stopped by sufficiently bad weather. Force deployment decisions could be tailored to the operational environment, if (1) the weather sensitivities of systems and subsystems were realistically tested at the various stages of development, and (2) sufficient research were done to enable these sensitivities to be translated into gross weather and climate parameters. Military aircraft are tested in nearly perfect weather, while nearly every type of weather in the world can be found somewhere in the United States. Appendixes, coauthored respectively by C. Schutz and R. R. Rapp, document the need for weather sensitivity tests, and present a preliminary mathematical model for including weather factors in force planning.
This publication is part of the RAND report series. The report series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993, represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.