Cover: Image Correlation

Image Correlation

Part II, Theoretical Basis

Published 1976

by H. W. Wessely


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback35 pages $20.00

The fundamental nature of the map-matching problem is examined and theoretical justification for using various comparison metrics is investigated. Since the problem is one of statistical decision theory, the optimum solution is to compute the likelihood ratio for each comparison and choose the match point at a place where the likelihood ratio is maximum. That requires a knowledge of N-dimensional joint probability distributions; hence, we resort to approximations that maximize or minimize several functions called "metrics." By considering two-picture-element scenes, the features of various metrics are explained and compared with the likelihood ratio. In this way heuristic arguments are developed that support the use of the Product algorithm (a sum of products that is related to classical correlation) when S/N is low, and the MAD algorithm (mean absolute difference) when S/N is high.

This report is part of the RAND report series. The report was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1993 that represented the principal publication documenting and transmitting RAND's major research findings and final research.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.