Workforce Management Requires an Analysis-Based Approach

Georges Vernez, Albert A. Robbert, H. G. Massey, Kevin Driscoll

Research SummaryPublished Feb 28, 2007

The U.S. Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) is responsible for developing, acquiring, and maintaining most Air Force weapons and other military systems. Many of AFMC's 100,000 personnel are civilians (56 percent) or contractors (26 percent) with specialized technical skills. As technology changes, so do AFMC's personnel requirements. To ensure that it has the right number of people with the right sets of skills in the right jobs at the right time, AFMC needs a stronger, analysis-based approach to planning and developing its workforce.

RAND Project AIR FORCE (PAF) described the four main steps involved in analytically grounded workforce planning and development; the policy decisions that need to be made; and the set of methods, data, and tools that should be used or developed to support each step.

Step 1. Describe workforce demand—what the workforce should be now and in the future—in terms of

  • Size. AFMC should determine how many staff members it needs.
  • The proportions of military, civilian, and contractor personnel. Planning requires well-defined criteria for workforce composition. The criteria might stipulate, for example, that some positions must be filled by military personnel who have combat or field experience.
  • Job competencies required. AFMC needs to know up front what competencies (for example, technical or management skills) it needs to develop or acquire and should update this information regularly.

Step 2. Describe workforce supply as it is now and is likely to be in the future given existing personnel practices and policies. Supply should be described in terms of size, composition, and job competencies.

Step 3. Compare demand with supply to identify gaps and allow AFMC to consider alternative strategies for filling the gaps, such as hiring, training, and changing workforce composition.

Step 4. Implement changes to meet demand. This includes developing the processes, practices, and monitoring tools needed to ensure that the force is managed from day to day and over time to meet workforce requirements.

AFMC should focus planning and development efforts on its core business units—including its products and logistics centers, laboratories, and test units—and on the positions within these organizations that are central to the units' respective missions.

PAF recommends assigning responsibilities for workforce management to the core business units. Headquarters AFMC's primary role should be to guide the process, provide support and assistance, and choose among trade-offs that may need to be made among business units. Similarly, career managers should have an advisory role.

Before it can fully engage in workforce planning and development, AFMC needs to strengthen its analytical capabilities, both at Headquarters AFMC and in its business units.

The four steps PAF has outlined should allow AFMC to manage its workforce using proactive analysis and to continue to meet Air Force manpower needs even as warfighting requirements, technology, and Air Force demand for products change.

Available for Download

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Vernez, Georges, Albert A. Robbert, H. G. Massey, and Kevin Driscoll, Workforce Management Requires an Analysis-Based Approach, RAND Corporation, RB-215-AF, 2007. As of October 15, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB215.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Vernez, Georges, Albert A. Robbert, H. G. Massey, and Kevin Driscoll, Workforce Management Requires an Analysis-Based Approach. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2007. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB215.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND research brief series. Research briefs present policy-oriented summaries of individual published, peer-reviewed documents or of a body of published work.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.