Report
An Operational Process for Workforce Planning
Jan 1, 2004
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 0.5 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
In 2000, the Acquisition Workforce 2005 Task Force of the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) called for the development and implementation of needs-based human resource performance plans for Department of Defense (DoD) civilian acquisition workforces. The greater need for workforce planning is expected to arise from an unusually heavy workforce turnover, itself due to a large number of expected retirements among older employees in a workforce that has not hired younger new workers in recent years, as well as from an expected transformation in acquisition products and methods in coming years.
The Director of Acquisition Education, Training and Career Development therefore asked the RAND Corporation to assist OSD and other defense organizations in devising methods of workforce planning. The workforce planning process that RAND researchers identified should be of interest to DoD human resource management professionals pondering how to adapt to pending changes in workforce composition, and it is also applicable for other complex organizations outside DoD.
Workforce planning helps ensure that an organization has the right mix—by education, experience, and skills—of personnel to advance its business. Private-sector organizations have engaged in workforce planning for decades, but, with some exceptions, such as planning for military forces, it is a relatively recent activity for the federal government. The need for workforce planning has increased in the wake of shifting views of work, with more workers seeking to change organizations throughout their careers; greater competition for more talented workers; rapidly changing technology work and the skills workers need; and, within DoD, a large number of workers nearing retirement age, increased reliance on contractors, and new acquisition strategies.
To be successful, workforce planning must answer four questions. These questions, along with the data needed to answer them and the information that can be gleaned from answers to them, are summarized in the figure below.
Among the elements needed to make workforce planning successful are active executive and line participation, accurate and relevant data, and sophisticated workload and inventory projection models. The focus of workforce planning is clearly at the level of business units for an organization. Workforce planning depends particularly on the business unit executives who determine how they intend to carry out their business and on the line managers who determine the capabilities needed. Leaders at levels above the business unit also play a critical role in workforce planning by translating higher-level direction into clear guidance for line organizations, integrating workforce planning results across business units, and supporting the results of workforce planning at lower levels.
Because the data needed by different business units for workforce planning are similar, corporate leadership should take the lead in developing a common source of such data, including a human resource information system both for near-term analyses and for inventory analyses as the workforce matures. The models needed to analyze these data also may be similar throughout the organization. The level of sophistication needed may differ among business units, but models can be expensive to develop and maintain for them. Corporate leadership should evaluate the availability, costs, and benefits of comprehensive, integrated workload and inventory projection models for all categories of employees (including, for civil service managers, contractors, if contractor personnel are integrated with civil service employees). If this evaluation suggests a positive return from developing such models, then corporate leadership should invest in them and encourage business units to modify them for individual situations.
This research brief describes work done for the RAND National Defense Research Institute.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research brief series. RAND research briefs present policy-oriented summaries of individual published, peer-reviewed documents or of a body of published work.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.