The impact of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, 2003–13

a multi-method evaluation

Susan Guthrie, Teresa Bienkowska-Gibbs, Catriona Manville, Alexandra Pollitt, Anne Kirtley, Steven Wooding

Research SummaryPublished Sep 1, 2015

We assessed the impact of the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme on academic research, health policy, clinical practice, patient health and economic outcomes, and made recommendations for the future.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Guthrie, Susan, Teresa Bienkowska-Gibbs, Catriona Manville, Alexandra Pollitt, Anne Kirtley, and Steven Wooding, The impact of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, 2003–13: a multi-method evaluation, RAND Corporation, RB-9864, 2015. As of October 5, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9864.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Guthrie, Susan, Teresa Bienkowska-Gibbs, Catriona Manville, Alexandra Pollitt, Anne Kirtley, and Steven Wooding, The impact of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, 2003–13: a multi-method evaluation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2015. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9864.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND research brief series. Research briefs present policy-oriented summaries of individual published, peer-reviewed documents or of a body of published work.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.