Cover: Systems for Air Transportation Serving the New York Metropolitan Area, 1975-1980

Systems for Air Transportation Serving the New York Metropolitan Area, 1975-1980

by Harrison S. Campbell, Dale M. Landi, Alan J. Rolfe

Description and analysis of the costs, benefits, and operational consequences of alternative enlarged air transportation systems for the New York region, including (1) expanding present capacity of the major airports, (2) expanding short-haul service using V/STOL aircraft, and (3) building a fourth major airport. Analysis shows the V/STOL system to be superior, providing greatest passenger trip-time benefits at the lowest cost, with an estimated $25-million-per-year advantage over the other two systems. V/STOL could also be effective in the interim required for implementation of the other plans, since both require lead times of several years. Additional problems associated with the other systems are (1) increasing present capacity would lead to severe ground access problems at Kennedy, and (2) the distance of the fourth airport from Manhattan would require high-speed rail connections and air shuttle service.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.