The Delphi Method, IV
Effect of Percentile Feedback and Feed-In of Relevant Facts
ResearchPublished 1970
Effect of Percentile Feedback and Feed-In of Relevant Facts
ResearchPublished 1970
An investigation of the effect on group accuracy of two variations in the Delphi procedures. In these exercises, 20 general information questions are answered by two groups of respondents, who, after receiving some form of feedback, may revise their answers. In the first variation, feeding back individual percentiles resulted in no improvement over feeding back the median and quartiles of the group response. On the other hand, in the second variation, adding a relevant fact to the median and quartiles information resulted in a statistically significant increase in numerical accuracy. The number of changed answers was also greater, suggesting that introduction of a relevant fact strengthens motivation for revision. For a number of military concerns, such as long-range technological development assessment or future threat evaluation, the expertise of a group of decisionmakers is relied on. The Delphi studies are an effort to improve such judgments through refined procedures.
This publication is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The research memorandum series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973, included working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.