Evaluation of Policy Options for Increasing the Availability of Primary Care Services in Rural Washington State

Mark W. Friedberg, Grant R. Martsolf, Chapin White, David I. Auerbach, Ryan Kandrack, Rachel O. Reid, Emily Butcher, Hao Yu, Simon Hollands, Xiaoyu Nie

ResearchPublished Nov 15, 2016

The Washington State legislature has recently considered several policy options to address a perceived shortage of primary care physicians in rural Washington. These policy options include opening the new Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine at Washington State University in 2017; increasing the number of primary care residency positions in the state; expanding educational loan-repayment incentives to encourage primary care physicians to practice in rural Washington; increasing Medicaid payment rates for primary care physicians in rural Washington; and encouraging the adoption of alternative models of primary care, such as medical homes and nurse-managed health centers, that reallocate work from physicians to nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs). RAND Corporation researchers projected the effects that these and other policy options could have on the state's rural primary care workforce through 2025. They project a 7-percent decrease in the number of rural primary care physicians and a 5-percent decrease in the number of urban ones. None of the policy options modeled in this report, on its own, will offset this expected decrease by relying on physicians alone. However, combinations of these strategies or partial reallocation of rural primary care services to NPs and PAs via such new practice models as medical homes and nurse-managed health centers are plausible options for preserving the overall availability of primary care services in rural Washington through 2025.

Key Findings

If There Are Shortages of Primary Care Physicians and Services in Rural Washington, These Shortages Are Likely to Worsen in the Coming Decade

  • The number of rural primary care physicians per capita will decrease by approximately 3.66 per 100,000 by 2025 — a 7-percent reduction from 2013 levels.
  • Urban areas of Washington State will experience a reduction of 4.14 primary care physicians per 100,000 — a 5-percent reduction from 2013 levels.
  • None of the policy options modeled in this report, on its own, will offset this expected decrease by relying on physicians alone.
  • Combinations of these strategies or partial reallocation of rural primary care services to nurse practitioners and physician assistants via such new practice models as medical homes and nurse-managed health centers are plausible options for preserving the overall availability of primary care services in rural Washington through 2025.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2016
  • Pages: 139
  • ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-9690-6
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1620
  • Document Number: RR-1620-ESC

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Friedberg, Mark W., Grant R. Martsolf, Chapin White, David I. Auerbach, Ryan Kandrack, Rachel O. Reid, Emily Butcher, Hao Yu, Simon Hollands, and Xiaoyu Nie, Evaluation of Policy Options for Increasing the Availability of Primary Care Services in Rural Washington State, RAND Corporation, RR-1620-ESC, 2016. As of September 4, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1620.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Friedberg, Mark W., Grant R. Martsolf, Chapin White, David I. Auerbach, Ryan Kandrack, Rachel O. Reid, Emily Butcher, Hao Yu, Simon Hollands, and Xiaoyu Nie, Evaluation of Policy Options for Increasing the Availability of Primary Care Services in Rural Washington State. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2016. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1620.html.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was sponsored by the Washington State legislature via the Washington State Institute for Public Policy and conducted by the RAND Health.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.