The Army wished to understand whether the Army's Force Generation (ARFORGEN) cycle created ebbs and flows in the ability of military treatment facilities to provide care and respond to changing family needs as soldiers and care providers deploy and return home. This study examines how the cycle affects capability and soldier health care utilization at Army military treatment facilities and how it affects family health care utilization.
Download
Download eBook for Free
Full Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.5 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Research Synopsis
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.1 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback92 pages | $27.95 | $22.36 20% Web Discount |
Research Questions
- How does the deployment cycle affect capacity and beneficiary utilization at Army military treatment facilities (MTFs)?
- How does the deployment cycle affect family health care utilization?
The Army was concerned about how the Army Force Generation (ARFORGEN) cycle, established to provide a predictable process by which Army units deploy, reset, and train to become ready and available to deploy again, affected the lives of Army soldiers and their families. In particular, the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army asked RAND Arroyo Center to determine whether ARFORGEN resulted in ebbs and flows in the ability of Army military treatment facilities (MTFs) to provide medical care and respond to changes in family needs as soldiers and care providers deploy and return home. This concern is especially well-founded because military health research has shown that family members of service members utilize health care differently during deployment than when the soldier is at home. This study found that MTF capacity is not greatly affected when soldiers and care providers deploy, and that MTFs may be slightly less busy than when soldiers and care providers are both at home. In aggregate, family member access to health care does not appear to be impinged when soldiers deploy, and soldiers who did not deploy with their unit slightly increase their utilization of health care during those times.
Key Findings
Effects of the deployment cycle on capacity and beneficiary utilization
- Soldier health care utilization decreases in aggregate with deployments, but nondeploying soldiers utilize more health care while their units are deployed.
- MTF capacity is not greatly affected when soldiers and care providers deploy. In aggregate, family member access does not appear to be impinged when soldiers deploy, and MTFs may be slightly less busy.
- The deployment cycle affects installations differentially. The portion of soldiers that deploy from an installation and the portion of providers that deploy from the MTF are two factors that vary across installations and can affect changes in the demand for care and availability of appointments at the MTF.
Effects of the deployment cycle on family health care utilization
- Spouses and children of single parents were less likely to utilize MTF care when soldiers deployed and were noticeably more likely to utilize care outside their area.
- All categories of family members shifted their care from MTFs to civilian providers during deployment.
- Spouses and children utilized more mental health care for stress- and depression-related diagnoses when soldiers in the family deployed. Spouses also increased utilization of antidepressants.
- Decreases in MTF utilization and increases in civilian care outside the catchment area were greater for younger Army families.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Analysis of Deployment Cycle Effects on MTF Staffing and Aggregate Workloads
Chapter Three
How Does Family Health Care Utilization Change in Response to the Deployment Cycle?
Chapter Four
Conclusions
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army and conducted by the RAND Arroyo Center.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.