Measurement-based care (MBC) in behavioral health is intended to improve the effectiveness of care through routine monitoring of patient symptoms to inform treatment and engage patients. This report documents the findings from qualitative interviews that assessed clinician and patient perspectives on various options for displaying MBC data.
Displaying Behavioral Health Measurement-Based Care Data
Identifying Key Features from Clinician and Patient Perspectives
Download Free Electronic Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.5 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Research Question
- What are the best methods to visually display MBC data to clinicians and patients within behavioral health settings?
Measurement-based care (MBC) in behavioral health is intended to improve the effectiveness of care through routine monitoring of patient symptoms to inform treatment and engage patients. Repeated assessment of patient symptoms, such as depression symptoms, yields multiple scores over time. Little is known about the best methods to display MBC data in a way that is clear and useful to both clinicians and patients. This report documents the findings from qualitative interviews that assessed clinician and patient perspectives on various options for displaying MBC data, with the goal of identifying core features of MBC data displays. Visual data displays were various graphs of depression or posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms over time.
Key Findings
- Clinicians preferred a downward-trending line graph to indicate improvement, as did more than half of patients.
- Clinicians and patients preferred the inclusion of interpretive ranges that indicated the severity of depression symptoms (e.g., mild, moderate) on the graph. Both preferred color displays of these ranges over a black-and-white display, as they were viewed as clearer and more engaging.
- Clinicians preferred the inclusion of a threshold line indicating the level of symptoms associated with a probable posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis, but patient perceptions were more mixed.
- Clinicians and patients preferred the inclusion of treatment milestones on the display (such as medication changes or aspects of psychotherapy). Clinicians desired the ability to customize the types of milestones that could be included. Clinicians and patients also wanted the option to display life-event milestones, such as job loss.
Recommendations
- Visual displays of MBC data, such as graphs of scores over time, can support clinicians sharing the results of data with their patients to facilitate discussions of progress, reinforce patient changes, and support shared decisionmaking about treatment adjustments.
- Optimal displays incorporate a downward-trending line to indicate improvement, interpretive guidance (severity ranges or a diagnostic threshold), use of color, and treatment milestones.
Research conducted by
This research was funded by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and carried out within the Quality Measurement and Improvement Program of RAND Health Care.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.