Redirecting Innovation in U.S. Health Care

Options to Decrease Spending and Increase Value

Steven Garber, Susan M. Gates, Emmett B. Keeler, Mary E. Vaiana, Andrew W. Mulcahy, Christopher Lau, Arthur L. Kellermann

ResearchPublished Mar 31, 2014

Cover: Redirecting Innovation in U.S. Health Care
Order a print copy

New medical technologies are a leading driver of U.S. health care spending. This report identifies promising policy options to change which medical technologies are created, with two related policy goals: (1) Reduce total health care spending with the smallest possible loss of health benefits, and (2) ensure that new medical products that increase spending are accompanied by health benefits that are worth the spending increases. The analysis synthesized information from peer-reviewed and other literature, a panel of technical advisors convened for the project, and 50 one-on-one expert interviews. The authors also conducted case studies of eight medical products. The following features of the U.S. health care environment tend to increase spending without also conferring major health benefits: lack of basic scientific knowledge about some disease processes, costs and risks of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, limited rewards for medical products that could lower spending, treatment creep, and the medical arms race.

The authors identified ten policy options that would help advance the two policy goals. Five would do so by reducing the costs and/or risks of invention and obtaining FDA approval: (1) Enable more creativity in funding basic science, (2) offer prizes for inventions, (3) buy out patents, (4) establish a public-interest investment fund, and (5) expedite FDA reviews and approvals. The other five options would do so by increasing market rewards for products: (1) Reform Medicare payment policies, (2) reform Medicare coverage policies, (3) coordinate FDA approval and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services coverage processes, (4) increase demand for technologies that decrease spending, and (5) produce more and more-timely technology assessments.

Key Findings

Features of the U.S. Health Care Environment That Substantially Affect the Costs, Risks, and Financial Rewards of Medical Product Invention

  • Lack of basic scientific knowledge about some disease processes
  • Costs and risks of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval
  • Limited rewards for medical products that could lower spending
  • Treatment creep
  • The medical arms race

Options to Reduce Costs and Risks of Invention and FDA Approval

  • Enable more creativity in funding basic science
  • Offer prizes for inventions
  • Buy out patents
  • Establish a public-interest investment fund
  • Expedite FDA reviews and approvals

Options to Increase Market Rewards

  • Reform Medicare payment policies
  • Reform Medicare coverage policies
  • Coordinate FDA approval and CMS coverage processes
  • Increase demand for technologies that decrease spending
  • Produce more and more-timely technology assessments

Recommendation

  • Because the stakes in reining in health care spending and getting more health benefits from the money we do spend are so high, all promising options should be considered — and the sooner the better. The longer we wait to institute fundamental reforms, the more money we will spend on health care offering little or no health benefit — and the harder it will be to achieve other major social priorities.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
130 pages
List Price
$32.95
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2014
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 130
  • Paperback Price: $32.95
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-8546-7
  • Document Number: RR-308

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Garber, Steven, Susan M. Gates, Emmett B. Keeler, Mary E. Vaiana, Andrew W. Mulcahy, Christopher Lau, and Arthur L. Kellermann, Redirecting Innovation in U.S. Health Care: Options to Decrease Spending and Increase Value, RAND Corporation, RR-308, 2014. As of September 15, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR308.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Garber, Steven, Susan M. Gates, Emmett B. Keeler, Mary E. Vaiana, Andrew W. Mulcahy, Christopher Lau, and Arthur L. Kellermann, Redirecting Innovation in U.S. Health Care: Options to Decrease Spending and Increase Value. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2014. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR308.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

The research described in this report was supported by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and was conducted in RAND Health, a division of the RAND Corporation.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.