This report assesses the FY 2012 reorganization of the Air Force Material Command (AFMC), which was undertaken as one of the initiatives to achieve mandated budget reductions by eliminating civilian manpower positions, thus achieving cost savings. One AFMC challenge was to absorb these cuts with minimal, if any, impact on its assigned missions in part by targeting staff positions.
Download
Download eBook for Free
Full Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Summary Only
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback98 pages | $28.95 | $23.16 20% Web Discount |
Research Question
- What effect has reorganization of the Air Force Materiel Command had on its ability to perform its assigned missions?
In fiscal year 2012, the Air Force Materiel Command reorganized as one of a number of initiatives to achieve mandated budget reductions. In the Fiscal Year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Congress required an assessment of five elements of this reorganization: (1) the effectiveness and efficiency of the reorganization; (2) the extent to which synergies due to collocation among developmental test and evaluation, science and technology, and acquisition can be replicated in the new organization; (3) the reorganization's impact on other commands' ability to meet their responsibilities for operational test and evaluation and follow-on test and evaluation; (4) whether the reorganization is in adherence with 10 U.S. Code Section 2687 (i.e., BRAC law); and (5) the extent to which the Air Force coordinated the reorganization with the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and if any concerns raised by OSD were addressed. This document fulfills the NDAA reporting requirements.
Key Findings
The Reorganization Created Opportunities for Increasing Effectiveness and Efficiency
- The elimination of civilian staff positions is expected to result in an annual savings of $109 million.
- The reorganization introduces opportunities for increased effectiveness and efficiency.
- AFMC is implementing initiatives to exploit these opportunities.
- Mitigating solutions have been put in place by AFMC to address potential challenges introduced by the reorganization.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction and Context of the AFMC Reorganization
Chapter Two
The AFMC Reorganization
Chapter Three
Methodology for Assessing the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Reorganization
Chapter Four
Assessing the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Reorganization
Chapter Five
Institutional Synergies and the Test and Evaluation Mission
Chapter Six
Adherence with 10 U.S.C. Section 2687
Chapter Seven
Coordination with the Office of the Secretary of Defense
Appendix
Section 2814 of the FY 2013 National Defense Authorization Act
Research conducted by
The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force and conducted by RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.