This report assesses water management, partnerships, rights, and market trends and opportunities, and how Army installations can potentially use them to improve programs and investments in water and wastewater systems. It provides examples from across the United States, along with detailed case studies of two states and two Army installations, and recommends ways to improve installation water security, programs, and infrastructure investments.
Water Management, Partnerships, Rights, and Market Trends
An Overview for Army Installation Managers
Download
Download eBook for Free
Full Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 17.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Research Synopsis
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.3 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback388 pages | $90.00 | $72.00 20% Web Discount |
Research Questions
- What are some of the key challenges facing water managers today?
- What are the ways that water managers try to manage and access water supplies?
- What are the current water partnership and market trends?
- What water market mechanisms and partnership opportunities can Army installations use to improve programs and investments in drinking water, wastewater, and other water systems?
- What Army policies and activities can be adjusted to improve installations' water security, programs, and infrastructure investments?
This report assesses existing water market mechanisms (such as water banking and auctions) and partnership opportunities that Army installations can potentially use to improve installation water programs and their investments in water and wastewater systems. Because such mechanisms and opportunities depend on water management practices and water rights, the report also provides an overview of these areas. In addition, the report provides examples from across the United States, along with detailed case studies of these issues within Colorado and Fort Carson and within Arizona and Fort Huachuca.
Water management today faces some key challenges, including aging infrastructure, water quality concerns, depleting groundwater aquifers, uncertain water supplies, pressures of population growth, climate change effects on water availability, and continued public demands for low-cost water. The traditional way of solving water problems — by increasing access to new surface water and groundwater supplies — is often no longer viable. Such water sources are mostly allocated, and in many cases over-allocated. Today, many water managers are focused on conservation, efficient management, and accessing alternative water sources (such as treated wastewater and stormwater runoff). Water markets and partnerships are also being used in select cases. Given such water management, partnership, and market trends, the report concludes with recommendations about how Army policies and activities can be adjusted to improve installations' water security, programs, and infrastructure investments.
Key Findings
Water Management Challenges
- Water managers today face many challenges, including aging infrastructure, water quality concerns, depleting groundwater aquifers, climate change effects on water availability, uncertain water supply, and public demands for low-cost water.
- The traditional way of solving water problems — by increasing access to surface water and groundwater supplies — is often no longer viable, because such water sources are mostly allocated or over-allocated.
Water Management, Partnership, and Market Trends
- Today, communities and water management agencies seek to conserve and manage existing water resources more effectively.
- Water managers are now using more nontraditional sources, including reclaimed water, stormwater runoff, and some desalinated water. Wastewater is becoming a valuable asset.
- Collaborations and partnerships for water planning and sharing of supply and infrastructure play an important role in regional, state, and local water planning and management and are likely to increase.
- Many water market experiments are being used to reallocate existing supplies to meet growing demands, but they are in their infancy.
Implications and Opportunities for Army Installations
- Water markets will provide future opportunities for Army installations.
- Water rights are becoming more important. Some installations are at risk of losing some water rights; water rights need to be actively managed and considered for all water sources, including surface water, groundwater, effluent, and stormwater runoff.
- State and local governments play a key role in planning and managing water sources and rights, and are a partnership opportunity for Army installations.
- Traditional installation water partnerships, such as Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) and Utility Energy Service Contracts (UESCs), can be useful tools.
Recommendations
- The Army should monitor how water market activities are evolving. It also should monitor state and local government water allocation policies, especially near major installations. And it should invest more headquarters staff expertise into water issues.
- The Army needs to support installation personnel to ensure that water rights are properly established, documented, maintained, and enhanced.
- Army headquarters should provide detailed, practical "how to" guidance on water rights for personnel who have water responsibilities.
- Installations should collaborate and partner more with state and local governments on water planning, management, and rights.
- The Army should encourage installations to incorporate more water projects into their ESPCs and UESCs and encourage water utilities to partner in UESC projects.
- The Army also should assess alternative approaches for funding the needed water infrastructure investments, including partnerships with local governments and other organizations.
- The Army should study the implementation of previous Army water utility privatization deals to develop lessons learned and incorporate them into future deals so those deals are conducted more effectively and efficiently and can ensure installation long-term water rights, security, conservation, and market opportunities.
- The Army should try to ensure that its installations' successful water-conservation efforts are considered during periods of regional and local water scarcity.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Background on U.S. Water Management Trends and Rights
Chapter Three
Army Installation Water Goals, Project Funding Sources, and Partnership Opportunities
Chapter Four
Water Market Mechanisms
Chapter Five
Colorado and Fort Carson Water Case Study
Chapter Six
Arizona and Fort Huachuca Case Study
Chapter Seven
Findings and Recommendations
Appendix A
Select Water Banks in the United States
Research conducted by
This research was sponsored by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment) and conducted within the Strategy, Doctrine, and Resources Program, a part of the RAND Arroyo Center.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.