Poor indoor climate

Its impact on health and life satisfaction, as well as its wider socio-economic costs

William D. Phillips, Barbara Janta, Daniel Gehrt, Lillian Flemons, Evangelos Gkousis, Sam Cole, Pamina Smith, Marco Hafner

ResearchPublished Mar 22, 2022

There is strong evidence that a poor indoor climate has a significant impact on people's health and well-being, and that in turn has wider socio-economic consequences, such as via its impact on work attendance, productivity and performance.

Four indoor hazards in particular were identified and used in the analysis: Damp and mould; Noise pollution; Indoor temperature (excess cold), and; Lack of daylight.

The objective of this study was to undertake a detailed analysis of the impact of the indoor climate across all age groups in the EU and the UK, Norway and Switzerland. For this purpose, the study team utilised the following:

  • A targeted data review of the key factors associated with indoor climate hazards.
  • A targeted literature review focusing on identifying and assessing evidence from existing systematic reviews and other relevant sources on the relationship between poor indoor climate, the health of particular population groups, and the wider socio-economic costs related to these hazards.
  • Well-being valuation analysis estimating the relationship between well-being, life satisfaction and the indoor climate.
  • Macroeconomic modelling assessing the economic implications of adults' exposure to particular indoor climate hazards in terms of productivity and wider societal costs, conducted using a multi-country computable general equilibrium (CGE) model.

Key Findings

Prevalence of poor indoor climate in Europe

Across the EU, UK, Switzerland and Norway (EU27+):

  • 13 per cent of the population live in a dwelling with damp or rot.
  • 18 per cent of the population live in a household affected by noise pollution.
  • 7 per cent of the population are unable to keep their home adequately warm.
  • 5 per cent of the population consider their home to be too dark.

The well-being effects from indoor climate hazards

There is a strong link between a poor indoor climate and health impacts. In addition, living with indoor climate hazards was found to be associated with lower levels of life satisfaction:

  • 1.6 per cent lower for damp in a dwelling.
  • 1.1 per cent lower for lack of daylight in a dwelling.
  • 0.6 per cent lower for noise in a dwelling.
  • 3.9 per cent lower for excess cold in a dwelling.

The economic effects from indoor climate hazards

The macroeconomic cost associated with exposure to damp and mould and the lack of daylight in residential buildings up to 2050 would be about EUR 53 billion. Furthermore, improving ventilation rates in offices could lead to an increase in gross domestic product (GDP) by up to EUR 180 billion. Finally, improving access to daylight in offices could lead to a cumulative increase in EU27+ GDP of up to EUR 200 billion.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Phillips, William D., Barbara Janta, Daniel Gehrt, Lillian Flemons, Evangelos Gkousis, Sam Cole, Pamina Smith, and Marco Hafner, Poor indoor climate: Its impact on health and life satisfaction, as well as its wider socio-economic costs, RAND Corporation, RR-A1323-1, 2022. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1323-1.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Phillips, William D., Barbara Janta, Daniel Gehrt, Lillian Flemons, Evangelos Gkousis, Sam Cole, Pamina Smith, and Marco Hafner, Poor indoor climate: Its impact on health and life satisfaction, as well as its wider socio-economic costs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2022. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1323-1.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was prepared for VELUX Group and conducted by RAND Europe.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.