Researchers assessed quantum computing vulnerabilities in the 55 national critical functions (NCFs) identified by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The researchers evaluated the significant issues affecting each NCF; rated it for urgency, scope, cost per organization, and other mitigating or exacerbating factors; then combined the ratings to rate each NCF's priority for assistance. This report documents their findings.
Preparing for Post-Quantum Critical Infrastructure
Assessments of Quantum Computing Vulnerabilities of National Critical Functions
Download
Download eBook for Free
Full Document
Does not include Appendix B.
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 1 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Appendix B
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 1.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
Format | List Price | Price | |
---|---|---|---|
Add to Cart | Paperback60 pages | $22.00 | $17.60 20% Web Discount |
Research Questions
- How are the NCFs vulnerable to future quantum computing capabilities?
- How should the federal government prioritize assistance to critical infrastructure owners and operators?
Future quantum computing capabilities are expected to be able to break the security of current implementations of public-key cryptography. Public-key cryptography forms the foundational building block of security for national information and communication infrastructure. Quantum computers will therefore create vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, although migrating to new post-quantum cryptography standards being developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology should mitigate vulnerabilities. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security asked the Homeland Security Operational Analysis Center to perform high-level assessments of quantum vulnerabilities in the 55 national critical functions (NCFs) identified by the department. Researchers evaluated the significant issues affecting each NCF, then rated each NCF in the categories of urgency, scope, cost per organization, and other mitigating or exacerbating factors. The researchers then combined these ratings to create an assessment of each NCF's priority for assistance. They rated six of the NCFs as high priority for assistance, 15 as medium priority, and 34 as low priority. In addition, the team identified three NCFs as critical enablers of the transition to the new cryptographic standard. Finally, the researchers identified four key findings: (1) All NCFs need to prepare for the transition, (2) a significant portion of the vulnerability can be addressed with relatively few actions by the critical enablers, (3) catch-and-exploit vulnerabilities are urgent for only a few stakeholders, and (4) many factors related to the cryptographic transition are still uncertain and in need of more-detailed assessment.
Key Findings
- All NCFs need to prepare for the transition.
- A significant portion of the vulnerability can be addressed with relatively few actions by the critical enablers.
- Catch-and-exploit vulnerabilities are urgent for only a few stakeholders.
- Many factors related to the cryptographic transition are still uncertain and in need of more-detailed assessment.
- Six NCFs are high priority for assistance, 15 as medium priority, and 34 as low priority.
- Three NCFs are critical enablers of the transition to the new post-quantum cryptography standard.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
Assessments of Quantum Vulnerabilities of the National Critical Functions
Chapter Three
Key Findings and Conclusion
Appendix A
Methods Used in the Assessments
Research conducted by
This research was sponsored by the National Risk Management Center (NRMC) and conducted by the Strategy, Policy and Operations Program within the Homeland Security Operational Analysis Center.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.