This report examines how Department of Defense graduate-level educational institutions, including the College of Information and Cyberspace (CIC), are currently addressing cyberspace and information education in their curricula, the potential demand across the department for this education, how CIC can contribute to fulfilling this demand, and support cyberspace and information education and research across the department.
Educating for Evolving Operational Domains
Cyber and Information Education in the Department of Defense and the Role of the College of Information and Cyberspace
Download eBook for Free
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 0.9 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Research Questions
- What is the potential demand for cyberspace and information education in DoD?
- How is this demand being addressed currently across DoD educational institutions?
- What is CIC's optimum role as part of the DoD educational ecosystem, and what other ways can CIC support DoD components?
- What is the appropriate governance mechanism to support CIC executing its mission successfully?
The Fiscal Year 2021 National Defense Authorization Act directed the Department of Defense (DoD) to provide a report on plans for closing the College of Information and Cyberspace (CIC) at the National Defense University and addressing the broader needs in the department for the types of education the college provided. DoD provided a response in April 2021 that outlined the original options considered for the college but deferred questions regarding the role for CIC and the department's needs for cyberspace and information education for a follow-on study that RAND's National Defense Research Institute conducted.
This report examines how DoD educational institutions operating at the graduate level, including CIC, are currently addressing cyberspace and information education in their curricula, the potential demand across the department for this education, and how CIC can contribute to fulfilling this demand, as well as what role it should play more broadly in supporting other DoD educational institutions and DoD components.
Key Findings
- DoD educational institutions are currently meeting one-third to one-half of the potential demand for cyberspace and information education at the graduate level.
- These schools take one of three approaches to cyberspace and information education: integration into the general curriculum, with no options for additional concentration; a general degree with an option to complete a concentration in cyberspace or information; or specialized degrees focused on cyberspace or information. Many also offer graduate certificates.
- CIC should sustain and potentially grow its capacity for master's and graduate certificate education.
- CIC's governance should include a DoD component that has a vested interest in the defense cyberspace workforce with accompanying funding to ensure CIC can sustain this role into the future.
Recommendations
- Maintain CIC's dual mission educating joint warfighters and the cyberspace workforce.
- Advertise CIC's programs more effectively across the department and beyond.
- Strengthen governance arrangements for the cyberspace workforce education mission.
- Position CIC as a resource on cyberspace education and research across DoD.
- Improve cross-departmental accounting for cyberspace and information environment work roles and functions.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
How the DoD Educates Leaders and Managers in Cyber and Information
Chapter Three
Comparing Demand and Supply for Cyber and Information Education
Chapter Four
Evaluating Options for the College of Information and Cyberspace
Chapter Five
Recommendations and Conclusion
Appendix A
Legislative Requirement from Public Law 116-283, 2021
Appendix B
Department of Defense Educational Institutions and Their Approach to Cyberspace and Information
Research conducted by
This research was sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Cyber Policy, and conducted within the Forces and Resources Policy Center of the RAND National Security Research Division (NSRD).
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.