Countering Violent Extremism in the Philippines

The threat of terrorism in the Philippines is ever-present

• The threat of terrorism and violent extremism in the Philippines is severe and persistent in some areas of the country, as current conditions—such as extreme poverty in areas of the Philippines, divisions between Catholic and Muslim culture and communities, grievances with the government, and recurring conflict—create a ripe environment for violent ideology to take root.
• Current CVE programming is insufficient to mitigate the threat.

Government-led CVE responses have been too much—and not enough

• Government responses, particularly under President Rodrigo Duterte, have been too heavy-handed, risking further radicalization among frustrated and desperate individuals.
• Beyond kinetic counterterrorism efforts, government programming in the CVE space also has suffered from a perceived lack of credibility, limited judicial capacity, and poor coordination.

Nongovernmental CVE programming needs better evaluation

• Although some nongovernmental CVE programming in the Philippines has proven successful, these programs are often microcampaigns without a wide-scale effect.
• Existing programming lacks systematic, rigorous evaluation, making it difficult to measure progress, effects, and areas that need improvement.
• Future CVE programmers should make a concerted effort to monitor and evaluate programs during implementation.