Download

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback44 pages $18.00 $14.40 20% Web Discount

Research Questions

  1. What changes in the reporting and analysis of readiness factors are needed to enable decisionmakers at Air Combat Command to assess readiness in an operationally relevant manner?
  2. How can readiness data be aggregated to measure deployable units?

Current force readiness and availability metrics have important deficits that limit their ability to inform U.S. Air Force decisionmakers about the number of units available and to identify capability and capacity shortfalls in meeting scenario demands. The authors of this report developed an approach that allows authoritative data sources that feed the current readiness reporting system to be leveraged and aggregated and therefore better measure the readiness of Air Combat Command forces to meet scenario demands. The methodology proposes the definition of combat power as the specific collection of personnel and equipment to fulfill a given capability (e.g., the air superiority capability of a six-ship of F-22 aircraft). Combat power readiness would be measured by linking the status of personnel and equipment to specific capability sets (e.g., fly the aircraft, maintain the aircraft) that contribute to the required set of Unit Type Codes demanded by scenarios when said power would be utilized.

Key Findings

  • The existing UTC construct provides a foundation for defining combat power and measuring its readiness.
  • The proposed approach can be used to assess combat power readiness from a manpower perspective. Shortfalls in personnel availability tend to drive low readiness; thus, a personnel assessment provides a close approximation of reality.
  • Improving access to some existing data and information would enable combat power readiness to be assessed and would provide decisionmakers with a metric that informs the availability of usable capability.

Recommendations

  • Track and make available personnel data at the individual level and equipment data at the part level. Including more-detailed personnel and equipment data in existing systems (e.g., Defense Readiness Reporting System–Strategic) will help to complete the readiness assessment.
  • Explicitly link personnel availability data to personnel training data. Personnel availability and training data must be considered and accessed simultaneously at the individual level, since bringing together availability and training data at the unit level overlooks important information.
  • Define or update descriptions and groupings of UTCs that enable their aggregation into relevant force packages. A more clear and concise description of mission capability statements of the UTCs is needed to provide the foundation for the grouping of UTCs into combat power.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Current Readiness Reporting and Its Shortfalls

  • Chapter Three

    An Approach to Measure Operationally Relevant Readiness and the Challenges to Implementing It

  • Chapter Four

    Summary and Recommendations

  • Appendix A

    Capability and Resource Readiness Reporting

  • Appendix B

    Description of UTCs from MISCAPs and MEFPAK

Research conducted by

This research was commissioned by the U.S. Air Force and conducted within the Force Modernization and Employment Program of RAND Project AIR FORCE.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.