Cover: Opportunities for an Artificial Intelligence–Focused Research Hub in Jackson, Mississippi

Opportunities for an Artificial Intelligence–Focused Research Hub in Jackson, Mississippi

Published Jun 20, 2024

by Vanessa Parks, Bridget R. Kane, Lewis Schneider, Gary Cecchine


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback44 pages $25.00

The existing research infrastructure of Jackson, Mississippi, presents an opportunity to meet a growing need for education, workforce development, and leadership in the areas of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. In this report, the authors outline approaches to developing an AI-focused research hub in Jackson. Such a hub would create the opportunity for community partners and stakeholders to collaborate. This would potentially bring together efforts from various local institutions, such as universities, businesses, hospitals, and government and military installations.

The report describes (1) ways existing research hubs (such as research parks and laboratories) have been developed, (2) potential barriers to and opportunities for Mississippi to develop a research hub of this scale, and (3) what current opportunities in AI research Mississippi may be best poised to address given current capabilities and partnerships.

The analysis is informed by a scoping review of information about research parks, National Laboratories, and other collaborative research efforts; a review of AI research priorities; and interviews with key stakeholders in Mississippi. The authors combine information about existing needs in the AI research space with existing research and technology capabilities in Mississippi to derive a suite of options for the development of a research hub in Jackson.

Key Findings

  • There are several strategies for organizing and supporting a research hub. A constellation model that includes multiple partners colocated in Jackson could provide partnering organizations the autonomy to pursue their own research agendas while sharing resources and space with other local partners. A hub and spoke model could connect Jackson to other regional and national research centers, National Laboratories, and military installations.
  • Mississippi's existing research and development capabilities could support AI applications in the areas of environment and critical infrastructure, health, education and community development, AI trust, and defense and homeland security.
  • Involved stakeholders were uncertain about the potential leadership and focus of the research hub but were encouraging and optimistic about the potential for conducting research that can support Mississippi and the broader nation, as well as support economic and community development. The direction of the research hub will likely become clearer as key stakeholders continue working together in collaboration.

Research conducted by

This research was funded by the Great City Foundation and conducted by Community Health and Environmental Policy Program within RAND Social and Economic Well-Being.

This report is part of the RAND research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.