Reading Full Books in Secondary English Language Arts Classrooms

Findings from the Spring 2025 American Instructional Resources Survey

Ashley Woo

ResearchPublished May 6, 2026

Scholars, education practitioners, and the media have raised concerns about the diminishing role of full books in schools. In this report, the author draws on data from the spring 2025 American Instructional Resources Survey, a nationally representative survey of public school teachers in kindergarten through grade 12, to examine the questions of whether secondary English language arts (ELA) teachers assign full books to students, how many books they assign, and how assignment varies by teachers’ curricula and context.

Survey data suggest that most secondary ELA teachers did assign at least one full book to students during the 2024–2025 school year. However, the findings reveal a more nuanced picture. Survey results suggest that full-book reading remains peripheral in most secondary ELA classrooms; 9 percent of teachers did not assign any full books, and about two-thirds of teachers assigned only one to four books. Teachers’ reports also suggest inequities to accessing full books: Teachers who served more historically disadvantaged students consistently assigned fewer full books—a pattern that begins as early as elementary school. On average, only about half of assigned books came from teachers’ required or recommended curriculum materials, suggesting limited instructional resources for full-book instruction.

These findings offer a foundational look at full-book reading in secondary ELA classrooms. By documenting the extent of full-book assignment and its relationship to student demographics, curriculum use, and instructional practice, this report provides a starting point for building the evidence base on full-book reading in ELA instruction.

Key Takeaways

  • During the 2024–2025 school year, two-thirds of secondary ELA teachers said that they planned to assign one to four full books to their students.
  • Teachers serving more historically disadvantaged students (i.e., students experiencing poverty, students of color, multilingual learners, and students with disabilities) assigned fewer full books.
  • On average, teachers assigned four full books, two of which came from their required or recommended curriculum materials. Most teachers (60 percent) assigned more books than were in their curricula.
  • Teachers who primarily used publisher-developed curricula assigned fewer books than teachers who did not use such curricula.
  • Teachers who assigned more full books were more likely to say that their students spent a majority of class time engaging with grade-level texts.

Recommendations

  • Curriculum developers could include more full books in ELA curricula.
  • Organizations that support curriculum selection should provide more information about which full books and how many books are in curricula.
  • Literacy researchers should continue to investigate how full-book reading can enhance literacy instruction and student outcomes.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Woo, Ashley, Reading Full Books in Secondary English Language Arts Classrooms: Findings from the Spring 2025 American Instructional Resources Survey. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2026. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA4594-4.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. All users of the publication are permitted to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and transform and build upon the material, including for any purpose (including commercial) without further permission or fees being required.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.