The Effect of the Massachusetts Health Care Cost Growth Benchmark on Hospital Revenues and Other Spending Outcomes
Associations with Hospital Revenue, Hospital Prices, and Insurance Premiums
ResearchPublished May 27, 2026
In this report, the authors evaluate the effects of Massachusetts’s health care cost growth benchmark—established in 2012 to constrain health care spending—on hospital revenues, hospital prices, and health insurance premiums. Although the cost growth benchmark was exceeded in most years since 2013, the policy may have slowed spending growth compared with what would have occurred otherwise.
Associations with Hospital Revenue, Hospital Prices, and Insurance Premiums
ResearchPublished May 27, 2026
In this report, the authors evaluate the effects of Massachusetts’s health care cost growth benchmark—established in 2012 to constrain health care spending—on hospital revenues, health care prices, and health insurance premiums. The cost growth benchmark, enforced by the Massachusetts Health Policy
Commission, sets annual spending growth targets and includes accountability measures for providers and payers. Although the cost growth benchmark was exceeded in most years since 2013, the policy may have slowed spending growth compared with what would have occurred otherwise.
The study uses four statistical approaches to estimate the benchmark’s effects, comparing Massachusetts hospitals and counties with various groups of hospitals and counties in other states and employing pre- and post-policy data. Results were mixed and method-dependent: Some approaches suggested that the cost growth benchmark reduced inpatient and outpatient hospital revenue and prices, while the authors found no significant effects in other approaches. There was no evidence that the benchmark affected health insurance premiums.
The analysis was limited by confounding factors, especially the near-simultaneous implementation of the Affordable Care Act, and by differences among Massachusetts and comparison states. The authors caution that findings are exploratory and not causal. Overall, the evidence that the Massachusetts health care cost growth benchmark reduced hospital revenue and prices was weak and inconsistent. The authors suggest that stronger enforcement or complementary policies may be needed to more effectively control health care spending growth.
This research was sponsored by Arnold Ventures and conducted independently by the RAND research team. This work was conducted in the Financing and Organization Program of RAND Health.
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.