Machine Learning for Operational Decisionmaking in Competition and Conflict

A Demonstration Using the Conflict in Eastern Ukraine

Eric Robinson, Daniel Egel, George Bailey

ResearchPublished Sep 19, 2023

The integration of machine learning into military decisionmaking is widely seen as critical for the United States to retain its military dominance in the 21st century. Advances in machine learning have the potential to dramatically change the character of warfare by enhancing the speed, precision, and efficacy of decisionmaking across the national security enterprise. This report explores how machine learning can be leveraged to enable military decisionmaking at the operational level of competition and conflict as part of a collaboration between machine learning tools and human analysts.

The authors present a case study based on a machine learning-based analysis of real-world data about the conflict in eastern Ukraine prior to Russia's 2022 invasion. This case study places the reader in a commander's shoes, tasked with making decisions about the best types of support to provide Ukrainian forces to achieve shared objectives. This analysis demonstrates that machine learning can improve efficiency by helping human analysts leverage massive data sets that would be impractical for humans alone to examine. The authors found that machine learning has great potential to enable military decisionmaking at the operational level of war but only when paired with human analysts who possess detailed understanding of the context behind a given problem.

Key Findings

  • Machine learning approaches can generate new insights to inform military decisionmaking in competition and conflict when employed as part of a human-machine collaborative system.
  • Human involvement—from analysts who possess detailed understanding of the context behind a given problem—is critical for deriving useful insights for military decisionmaking from currently available machine learning capabilities.
  • By enabling dramatic efficiency gains in the performance of repetitive tasks, a human-machine systems approach can analyze massive data sets at a scale that would be impractical for human analysts alone, generating new insights about the operational environment that would have previously been unattainable.
  • Machine learning enables standardized, objective, and long-term analysis of a multitude of data streams already available in an operational-level headquarters.

Recommendations

  • The Army should provide personnel at all echelons of command with frequent exposure to machine learning to build familiarity with how humans can leverage these capabilities as part of a military decisionmaking system.
  • The Army should build diverse machine learning teams to unlock the full potential of this capability, integrating operations research systems analysts with operators, analysts, and commanders to help interpret the implications of machine learning-based analysis.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
89 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 2023
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 89
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 1-9774-1210-6
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR-A815-1
  • Document Number: RR-A815-1

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Robinson, Eric, Daniel Egel, and George Bailey, Machine Learning for Operational Decisionmaking in Competition and Conflict: A Demonstration Using the Conflict in Eastern Ukraine, RAND Corporation, RR-A815-1, 2023. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA815-1.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Robinson, Eric, Daniel Egel, and George Bailey, Machine Learning for Operational Decisionmaking in Competition and Conflict: A Demonstration Using the Conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2023. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA815-1.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This research was sponsored by the United States Army and conducted by the Strategy, Doctrine, and Resources Program within the RAND Arroyo Center.

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.