Cover: Healthcare Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Older Patients

Healthcare Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Older Patients

Using Cataract Surgery and Breast Cancer Treatment Data

Published 2002

by Arash Naeim

Download eBook for Free

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 8.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

This dissertation is divided into two sections. The cataract surgery section has two subcomponents: A methodological subsection focuses on strategies for imputing responses among older patients to questions not answered on the vision section of the Heath Utilities Index Mark 3 questionnaire. The cost-effectiveness analysis is based on a randomized clinical trial of older patients with cataracts, comparing up-front surgery versus watchful waiting in patients who have relatively good visual functioning. The use of a preoperative tool, the Cataract Surgery Index, was shown to discriminate between those with high and low probability for improvement from surgery and those for whom surgery was cost-effective. The breast cancer section focuses on an evidence-based decision analysis for patients older than 65 who have newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer. The uncertainty associated with treatment decision in older breast cancer patients can be mapped using a decision analysis framework. In both 65- and 75-year-old patients, there were scenarios for which combined hormone and chemotherapy could be considered cost-effective. Sensitivity testing taking into account higher discount rates in older patients and different baseline quality-of-life states altered the cost-effectiveness of most adjuvant therapy strategies.

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.