Value of Information for Policy Analysis

David Manheim

ResearchPublished May 15, 2018

Cover: Value of Information for Policy Analysis

This dissertation considers the viability of applying Value of Information (VoI) methods in complex systems for policy analysis, concluding that these methods can be applied, but that different methods are appropriate in different cases. VoI is value to a decisionmaker of the difference information makes for a decision, or what a decisionmaker should pay for information. Compared to present practice, specific value of information techniques can potentially improve policy analysis and decision making. To that end, a methodology for policy applications of VoI is presented that can simplify practical application.

The dissertation applied computational methods for VoI to two case studies in disparate domains: biosurveillance and detection of violent extremists. Each of the case studies outlines how Bayesian methods can be used to evaluate VoI, including a novel formulation for considering additional information sources in the systems. The case studies are used both to consider the relative benefits and drawbacks of these approaches in policy decision making, and to identify potential challenges. Approaches for identifying and avoiding these challenges and for selecting appropriate methods are integrated into the overall methodology, which is presented in the final chapter.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Manheim, David, Value of Information for Policy Analysis, RAND Corporation, RGSD-408, 2018. As of September 23, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD408.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Manheim, David, Value of Information for Policy Analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2018. https://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD408.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This document was submitted as a dissertation in March 2018 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Paul Davis (Chair), Steven Popper, and Kathryn Laskey.

This publication is part of the RAND dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.