Treatment Not Custody
Process and Impact Evaluation of the Santa Monica Homeless Community Court
Download eBook for Free
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 6.4 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
This dissertation is a process and impact evaluation of the Santa Monica Homeless Community Court. At homeless courts, misdemeanor quality of life cases arising from an individual's homelessness are resolved through alternative sentencing that requires participants to work towards permanent housing and obtain treatment to address underlying issues such as mental health disorders and substance use disorders. Although homeless courts have the potential to increase permanent housing placement and decrease recidivism, homeless courts have not been well-studied. There is only one publicly available homeless court evaluation, which included a recidivism impact analysis using an unmatched comparison group and did not include a housing impact analysis.
My research uses qualitative and quantitative methods to answer the following research questions:
- How do government entities and non-profit social service organizations work together to deliver the Santa Monica Homeless Community Court?
- How can the Santa Monica Homeless Community Court's enrollment and retention be improved?
- Is graduation from the Santa Monica Homeless Community Court associated with improved housing outcomes and decreased recidivism?
Table of Contents
Part One
Introduction
Part Two
Literature Review
Part Three
Qualitative Methods Used to Examine Program Delivery and Explore Potential Ways to Improve Enrollment and Retention
Part Four
How Do Government Entities and Non-Profit Social Service Organizations Work Together to Deliver the Santa Monica Homeless Community Court (Research Question 1)?
Part Five
Part V: How Can the Santa Monica Homeless Community Court's Enrollment and Retention Be Improved (Research Question 2)?
Part Six
Quantitative Methods Used to Estimate Effect of Graduation on Housing Outcomes
Part Seven
Is Graduation from the Santa Monica Homeless Community Court Associated with Improved Housing Outcomes (Research Question 3)?
Part Eight
Conclusions and Policy Recommendations
Appendix A
Interview Protocols
Appendix B
Technical Appendix
Research conducted by
This document was submitted as a dissertation in July 2018 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Sarah Hunter (Chair), Matthew Cefalu, and James Anderson.
This publication is part of the RAND Corporation Dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.